Brands weighing Mexico against Asia almost always start with the same question: is it cheaper? That's not the question that actually matters. The real question is what changes structurally when your supply chain sits a few hours from the border instead of a few weeks across an ocean, and just as importantly, what stays exactly as hard as it was before.

  • $40.8 billion in Mexico FDI in 2025, a record year, up nearly 11% year-over-year
  • Mexico climbed six positions to #19 in Kearney's 2026 FDI Confidence Index
  • Manufacturing exports to the US grew by $150 billion since 2021, reaching $535 billion in 2025
  • Over 60% of American manufacturers are considering or actively relocating production to Mexico
  • Typical labor costs run $4.50 to $6.51 an hour in Mexico, versus $6.50 to $7.87 in China
  • Total landed cost savings versus overseas sourcing typically run 20 to 30%

The real question isn't cost per unit

Ocean freight from Asia takes four to six weeks in transit before customs even starts processing the shipment. Once you account for the working capital tied up in that inventory, tariff volatility, container rate swings, and the buffer stock brands hold just to cover the lag, Mexico typically runs 20 to 30% lower in total landed cost, not sticker price per unit. Catching a defect on a factory floor a few hours away is also a very different problem than discovering it weeks after a transpacific shipment has already cleared customs.

Why the nearshoring numbers keep climbing

The numbers behind the shift are hard to ignore. Mexico pulled in $40.8 billion in foreign direct investment in 2025, a record year, up nearly 11% from the year before, and climbed six positions to #19 in Kearney's 2026 FDI Confidence Index. Manufacturing exports to the US have grown by $150 billion since 2021, reaching $535 billion in 2025. Over 60% of American manufacturers are now considering, or actively relocating, production to Mexico. Some of that is cost, typical labor runs $4.50 to $6.51 an hour here versus $6.50 to $7.87 in China, but the bigger driver is structural: shorter transit times, tighter feedback loops between brand and factory, and USMCA trade access.

What doesn't show up in a spreadsheet

Proximity to Mexico is not an automatic advantage. It only pays off if a brand actually uses it, with on-site management and a real relationship with the factory floor, not just a shorter flight. Plenty of brands nearshore and still run their sourcing the same way they ran it from across the Pacific, remotely, on a quarterly check-in cadence, and lose most of the benefit that proximity was supposed to give them. The 2026 USMCA joint review will also look at rules of origin and tariff terms, which is one more reason to have a team already positioned on the ground rather than reacting after the fact.

Where VTX Group fits into that move

VTX operates out of León, Guanajuato and runs all six disciplines, raw materials, sourcing, product development, production management, QA/QC, and logistics, under one accountable team, instead of a brand having to coordinate multiple disconnected vendors across time zones. Part of that job is giving brands a straight answer on regional fit before they commit, including telling them when Mexico isn't the right move for what they're making.

The FDI numbers explain why nearshoring is trending. They don't execute anything. Execution is the part that doesn't show up in a statistic, and it's the actual determinant of whether a move to Mexico works for your brand.

Weighing Mexico against your current sourcing?

Tell us what you're making today, and we'll give you a straight comparison.